Thou Shalt not Trample on the Constitution :: essays research papers fc

cat valium Shalt not Trample on the Constitution. Congress shall make no justness respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof or abridging the granting immunity of speech, or of the press or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to supplicant the establishment for a redress of grievances. This is the first amendment to the Constitution. In essence this states that the government will not become involved or sponsor whatsoever religion. There is a reason our founding fathers added this amendment to the Constitution. Any time a government becomes involved with religion or visa versa, Disaster happens. If you wish evidence of this look at the history of Europe for the past 700 long time and see what chaos has arisen when religion and the state intertwine. Yet we do not seem to be learning from the past. Congress on June 17, 1999, passed a police force that scags the First Amendment in the face. That law allowed for the states t o choose to post the Ten Commandments in public schools and other government buildings. The law that was proposed by Rep. Bob Barr (R-GA), Rep. Robert Alderholt (R-Al), and Rep. total heat Hyde (R-IL). The bill was created in response to the Columbine shootings that took place April 20, 1999. The bill was sweep through the house at a time when the country was in shock over the shootings. There were several reasons why the house matte the need to pass such a bill. Rep. Alderhold believed that it is an important step to agitate morality, and an end of children killing children. (Leavitt) Rep. Hyde believes that the amendment should slow the flood of toxic waste into the minds of our children. (Webster) Rep. Barr went as far to say that if Columbine had the Ten Commandments posted that the massacre of April twentieth would not have occurred.(Webster) These are the arguments for the Ten Commandments to be posted in public schools. These are the best reasons our elected representativ es could come up with to slap the First Amendment in the face. Is it really as Rep. Alderholt said We have the license of religion, not freedom from religion? (Leavitt) According to the Supreme Court The right Alderholt is wrong. In 1980 the Supreme Court ruled that a similar Kentucky law, which inevitable all classrooms to post a copy of the Decalogue, was unconstitutional. The oppositions arguments against this law are enormous.